Progress in Sign Language Research: In Honor of Siegmund Prillwitz
Oralism, on the other hand, saw integration as a way of assimilating the deaf individual to the majority of the society. In the late 1980s there were a lot of disputes about this concept. These debates were dominated by hearing people who assumed that they had the power of definition. Siegmund Prillwitz fought against this until his ideas and aims were supported by minority right movements and were visible in changes in society and in the implementation of disability acts. Today he may be proud of the fact that through his early writings about sign language and communication of the Deaf he actively contributed to such important social improvements.
Language for Siegmund Prillwitz was never just an instrument or a medium. He did not differentiate between representation and memory or thinking, and problem-solving or learning, but he always thought of language as communication which develops in “everyday relations of experiences and actions assisted by a communicative exchange” (p. 274) with family members and the society. From the beginning he sketched an ecological perspective on language development, carefully showing the relation between cognition and socialisation.
Milestones on his way to international reputation were two international congresses:
His major contribution to sign language research and his most innovative idea, however, was the development of the Hamburg Notation System (HamNoSys) in the, a notation for signs which was more comprehensive and more precise than previous notation systems. It has undergone a number of major revisions since it was first published. The major advantage of HamNoSys was that it could be used on a computer and stored in databases. It is thus ideal for use in attempts of semi-automatic language translation which is the aim of the current ViSiCAST project.
Siegmund Prillwitz realised very early that scientific research alone does not grant success on a political level. He therefore founded Signum Press – a medium for informing the public, for spreading ideas, and for extending the discussion forum. Thus Siegmund Prillwitz was an entrepreneur from the beginning, practising private-public-partnership in one person with considerable financial commitment on the part of his own private capital.
Apart from his ability to organise big scientific events and his capacity to acquire new funds for research projects, however, his most valuable talent is probably to surround himself with a number of engaged and loyal friends who share his vision.
We wish to express our gratitude to all colleagues who contributed an essay in honour of Siegmund Prillwitz and to those who wanted to contribute but could not make it in time to be included in this volume. Special thanks go to Tobias Meyer-Janson and Constanze Schmaling for helping us producing this volume.